28 Nov 2011
We can do more than survive, we can flourish
By Steve Carter, Mental Health Promoter, Mental Health Foundation
Few Cantabrians will have failed to be moved on reading John McCone’s article (The Quake’s Long Term Toll – Press 5/11). As with much of the best writing it holds a mirror up to our own experiences, giving me permission to admit that I am emotionally and physically exhausted. My long term relationship has ended and some of my closest friends are no longer here, having fled in the face of the disaster. There are days when I feel alone and adrift in the face of an overwhelming and continuing event sequence.
The truth is that none of us can answer the complex range of questions we face. We instinctively know that this is the case and feel the need to relinquish some sense of control but we are not sure how or when this might be possible.
One response is to focus increased attention on our work, as if that might keep the wolf from the door, but even then we risk “hitting the wall” and facing the inevitability of the ‘disillusionment phase’.
I have spent this year reflecting on the veracity of the work I do at the Mental Health Foundation. Mental Health Promotion is not a service response to individual mental illness or distress but takes a wider approach that embraces all the things that support mental health and wellbeing for all members of society. To establish the difference between the two, we assert the use of the word ‘flourishing’. A concept borne out of the positive psychology movement, flourishing is a state where people experience positive emotional affect, positive psychological and social functioning most of the time. When someone is flourishing they feel good and they function well.
Even without the presence of specific diagnosable symptoms, it is clear that the opposite is emerging across Canterbury right now. At the heart of the disillusionment phase is a mental malaise, characterised by tiredness, de-motivation, emotional emptiness. Don Elder captured it perfectly: “I was no longer thinking clearly, performing well in my job or functioning usefully for those around me.”
Flourishing is not just a measure of happiness or life satisfaction or positive thinking. It accounts for the harder aspects of life – grief, anger, frustration – and indeed incorporates them as a necessary part of a broader understanding of psychological and emotional functioning. Could a focus on flourishing be one answer to the phase into which we are moving? Professor Margaret Barry of the World Health Organisation Collaborating Centre for Health Promotion Research might well say so. She has said that “positive mental health is a key asset and resource for population wellbeing and the long-term social and economic prosperity of society”.
The Mental Health Foundation advocates for the use of the ‘5 Ways To Wellbeing,’ an evidence-based framework for the development of positive mental health at population levels. Our work across New Zealand builds upon work done for the UK Government by the New Economics Foundation (NEF), which aimed to develop a ‘mental health equivalent’ of the established five plus a day fruit and vegetables campaign. The project gathered together the results of an international meta-analysis of multi-disciplinary studies to offer a simple and effective set of messages to support the development of positive mental health and wellbeing. They are messages that everybody can relate to: Connect, Take Notice, Keep Learning, Give, Be Active.
The earthquake sequence gives us a unique insight into the effectiveness of strategies such as these. We know that, in the year since September 4, evidence of trauma, including PTSD, depression and other psycho-social impacts have not reached the peaks that were immediately expected. Indeed, it is of enormous significance that statistics from the Office of The Coroner show a reduction in the levels of deaths by suicide in Canterbury over that period.
Of course, the debate will continue about the exact reasons for this, but it is not unreasonable to suggest that what we have seen within our families and our neighbourhoods and communities over the last year strongly echoes the scientific evidence placed before us by the NEF framework. There have been huge outpourings of giving and voluntarism in response to the quakes; people are connected more strongly through shared experience; we are learning new things about ourselves and the world around us all the time; we are all out there, putting in the hard yards; and, at the heart of it all, we are thrown into a situation where, day-to-day, gratitude for small mercies and glimmers of hope for the future may well be the most profound and simple things that prevent us from crumbling.
But as the phase shifts into disillusionment and recognition of the daunting journey ahead, this work can not rest on immediate resilience-building. Questions have to be asked about the maintenance of fortitude among the people of this city. It has been suggested that suicide levels will return to their pre-quake levels once things “return to normal”. Are we really going to accept that as inevitable? What kind of “normal” is that? We are told that the disillusionment phase is “to be expected”. Will we just allow ourselves to capitulate, to accept that we are powerless in all this?
I would not be so glib as to suggest this is an easy task, a simple matter of imagining it all away. I have days when getting out of bed is a struggle. We have seen many heroes over the last year, but it is certain that each one of them will have a point where they need to attend to their mental health needs or risk breaking.
Whilst a focus on our own wellbeing can be empowering and cathartic, there are also broader responsibilities. At population levels, we must engineer situations to enable people to access these tools for themselves. How do employers recognise and support the mental health needs of all their staff? How are our educators assessing and responding to the psycho-social needs of children and their families? How much importance will be placed on mental health and wellbeing when strategic decisions are made regarding the rebuild?
This isn’t just about the immediate aftermath. We have survived this far and we can feel proud of that. It’s not even about negotiating the tricky emotional waters of the disillusionment phase we are told is to come. We actually have a unique opportunity to leave a legacy for the future generations that will live, work and play here. We have the power to define a “new normal”. Is it really so foolish to believe that we can make Christchurch a flourishing city?
The above was originally published in The Press on 21 November
